Grade 8 Drama
Grade 8 · MYP Drama Grade 8 Drama

Unit 3 · Term 3 · 10 lessons

Naturalism

You perform a naturalistic duologue or monologue using Stanislavski’s techniques. You annotate a script for objectives, units, action verbs and subtext, then get it on its feet. This is the unit where the smallest choices matter most.

A poster headed Naturalism. A single wooden chair stands alone in a shaft of warm light on a dark stage. Beside it: Stanislavski, the system, the actor's craft. Playing the truth, honesty on stage, living truthfully in imaginary circumstances. Emotion, access, respond, reveal. Memory, personal, emotional, authentic. Real people. Real lives. On stage.

The unit

Stanislavski · naturalistic duologues and monologues

Statement of inquiry
Communication combines verbal and non-verbal elements to express emotions and develop relationships in theatre.
Key concept Communication
Related concept Role, Interpretation, Expression
Global context Identities and relationships
Formally assessed Criterion B, Developing. Criterion C, Performing.
3

What you hand in

Four things come out of this unit. Everything else is rehearsal.

A performance

A naturalistic duologue in pairs or a monologue solo.

An annotated script

Unit divisions, objectives, super objective and action verbs in the margins, with subtext in a second colour.

A ground plan

Plus your written artistic intention.

Three journal moments

Including the blocking you tried and abandoned.

Three moments, not one

What goes in your journal

Your journal opens three times this unit. Your teacher will tell you when. Each moment wants two things. Evidence you gathered at the time, then writing that explains it. Nobody is marking your spelling or how neat it looks. They are marking your thinking.

Capture it while it is still messy. A blurry rehearsal photo of something you were still figuring out is worth more than a tidy one taken afterwards and the versions you rejected are what prove extensive exploration.

Moment 1 Lessons 1 and 2 · Criterion B

Research and given circumstances

What to put in
  • Your Naturalism in 60 Seconds recording and your Stanislavski fact file.
  • Your completed six questions and the script title and character you are playing.
  • Get creative: a photograph of your hot seating notes or the clip of naturalistic acting you analysed.
What to write

ResearchWho was Stanislavski and what was he reacting against? Explain one element of his system in your own words and cite where you found it.

JustifyWhy did you choose this script and this character? What about their situation made you think: I want to explore what this would feel like?

Moment 2 Lessons 3 to 7 · Criterion B

Annotated script and artistic intention

What to put in
  • Your annotated script: unit divisions, objectives, super objective and action verbs in the margins.
  • Your subtext annotations in a second colour, your ground plan and your written artistic intention.
  • Get creative: photograph the blocking you tried and abandoned. Rejected versions are what evidence extensive exploration.
What to write

CaptureWhich action verbs did you choose and what changed in the room when you played them?

DevelopWhere is the gap between what your character says and what they mean? How are you showing that gap without stating it?

Moment 3 Lesson 10 · Criterion C

Performance and reflection

What to put in
  • Your performance recording link, plus one photograph of the moment you are proudest of.
  • Get creative: a still from the recording with your own annotation on it.
What to write

ReflectDid the performance achieve your artistic intention? Which of Stanislavski’s techniques made the most difference?

EvaluateWhere did the truth of it hold and where did you catch yourself performing rather than listening?

The same answer, twice

What a 5 and a 7 actually look like

Both of these answer the same journal question: Which action verbs did you choose and what changed in the room when you played them?

5 to 6
I chose the action verbs to persuade and to comfort for my lines. Playing them made my performance more natural and helped me get into character. It made the scene feel more realistic and believable for the audience.
7 to 8
I had been playing the whole scene to comfort, which is why it kept going soft and nothing really happened. My partner said it felt like we agreed with each other. So I changed the second unit to to provoke and kept the same lines. It changed how I used the space between us. I started moving closer to my partner, used more emphasis on certain words and made the pauses shorter because I was pushing for an answer. The words stayed exactly the same, but changing what I wanted from them changed the way I said them and how I used my body. The audience could see the pressure building and the relationship between the two characters changing without either of us raising our voices.

What’s the difference?

The first answer tells us what the student chose and that it helped. The second answer shows us what they actually changed and why.

  1. What I chose
  2. How I played it
  3. What I changed
  4. Why I changed it
  5. What happened to the audience
A reminder

Think about what the audience could actually see or hear. Did you change your pace, volume, pauses, movement, eye contact, distance, posture or physicality?

Don’t just say “it created tension.” Explain what you did that created the tension.